STATE TIMES NEWS JAMMU: Urging upon the government to clear the air with the regard to the basis for allocation of in-service employees of the state amongst the two Union Territories as well as the conditions of service in the successor UTs, Harsh Dev Singh, JKNPP Chairman and former Minister said that uncertainly continued to haunt the government employees of J&K. Harsh said that there were certain disturbing and offensive clauses which had created alarm amongst the civil servants. He said that sub Sec (1) of Sec 89 unambiguously stated that those serving in the existing state of J&K on ‘substantive’ basis shall continue to serve in the resulting UTs from the appointed date ‘provisionally’. Expressing dismay over the extremely vexatious clause in the J&K Re-organization Act, Singh questioned as to how a ‘substantive’ service could be converted into ‘provisional’ service merely on the division of State. He said that the intention behind the said clause was re-enforced by virtue of a further provision in Sec 91 which provided that competent authority could discontinue the services of any employee or abolish the post or office from the appointed date i.e, October 31, 2019. Quoting the proviso to Sec 91, Singh said that it unambiguously stated “provided that nothing in this section shall be deemed to prevent a competent authority, on and from the appointed day, from passing in relation to such person any order affecting the continuance in such post or office”. He further pointed towards the unbridled powers conferred by Sec 90 upon the Lt Governor who was vested with the powers to change the conditions of service of a government employee. He said that as per Sec 89 of the J&K Re-organization Act, the power “to determine the successor Union Territory to which each employee of the existing state shall be finally allotted for service” has been vested in the Lt Governor. He further pointed out that the Lt Governor was required to issue the said order of allocation of Union Territories amongst the employees immediately upon the division of state into the said two UTs. He said that the government was required under Sec 89 (2) to seek options from the government employees with regard to their preferences for either of the two UTs which though were not binding upon the government. “The government however had failed to initiate any process for seeking such options from the govt employees despite very little time having been left for the proposed transition which was to take effect from October 31, 2019,” he lamented. And though the Lt Governor of UT of J&K had been conferred with additional powers to depute officers from one UT to the other, the requirement of taking options from the service employees could not have been dispensed with as per the provisions of the aforesaid Act, said, adding that non-initiation of action in the regard had also crated apprehensions which too needed to be dispelled.
Shilpa Shetty Kundra, Raj Kundra welcome baby girl
Taapsee, Tahir to star in Hindi adaptation of German classic ‘Run Lola Run’
Drug abuse poses serious hazard to society: Dr Sushil
Sidharth Shukla wins ‘Bigg Boss 13’
‘Haathi Mere Saathi’ not an easy film to make: Rana Daggubati
© 2017 State Times Daily Newspaper