STATE TIMES NEWS
JAMMU: In another big jolt to the state government, the Division Bench of Jammu and Kashmir High Court headed by Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur on Wednesday dismissed 15 more LPAs filed against the judgment of Writ Court quashing the premature retirement.
The DB dismissed the LPA filed by the State against Kishore Kumar Gupta, Chief Engineer, Kamal Mahendru, Additional Provident Fund Commissioner, Babu Ram, Additional Secretary Social Welfare, Dr. Manoj Bhagat, Medical Superintendent, Parshotam Kumar, Shabir Ahmed, Madan Lal, Ghulam Hassan Kamal, Padam Dev Sharma, Ghulam Hassan Kamal, Syed Ikhlaq Hussain, Romesh Chander, Gian Chand, Baj Singh, Krishan Lal and Khurshid Ahmed.
Nine appeals of government were dismissed on Tuesday while six appeals were dismissed on Wednesday by the Division Bench by upholding decisions of Single Bench, thereby reinstating the government servants, who were prematurely retired on June 30, 2015.
The DB had observed that in most cases government/ committee had shown door to employees merely on the registration of an FIR which is not sufficient ground for this action. It had also observed in the case of K.K Gupta, Chief Engineer, there was neither any FIR nor any complaint. Surprisingly, he was recommended to be confirmed as Chief Engineer by State Vigilance Organization/General Administration Department two months after the issuance of premature retirement order.
The Division Bench after hearing both the sides observed that with a view to get information regarding the reputation which an officer, in this case the petitioner enjoyed, the concerned Secretary of the Administrative Department had been co-opted as a member of the committee whose views were given due respect and weightage while making the recommendation.
While the committee can always asses the integrity of a government servant and consider the reputation which he enjoys yet for assessing the same, there has to be some basis in the service records. Hearsay reputation or casual statements questioning the integrity of a person ought not to be considered for the same may be baseless or attributed for malafide purposes.
Even for purposes of assessing the reputation of a government servant, the material must be cogent, the same must be in the shape of record which must then be considered in the correct perspective.
Opinion regarding doubtful integrity and questionable reputation must emanate from an officer, who has had an opportunity to see the work and conduct of the officer from a close quarter on a day to day basis.
Relying upon an opinion of Secretary of the Administrative Department, who might not have any firsthand information and experience of having seen and worked with the officer concerned would be both risky and uncalled for and would give credence to the saying “give a dog a bad name and then kill it.’
Division Bench observed in the present case, the committee has not discussed as to what was the source or material based upon which the petitioner was said to be not enjoying good reputation. If that be so, the order of pre mature retirement based upon any such assessment can only be said to be arbitrary and thus cannot be upheld on the legal touchstone.
Division Bench observed that testing the facts of the present case on the touchstone of the law discussed hereinabove, it can be seen that the Committee constituted by the Govt. did not at all consider the relevant material and had taken a decision based only upon the fact that an FIR had been registered by the Vigilance Organization Jammu against the petitioner. In that view of the matter, there was no justification for the State to pre-maturely retire the respondent-petitioner from service. With these observations Division Bench dismissed the appeals of the state.
Earlier in November 24, 2017, a Division Bench of State High Court comprising Chief Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed and Justice Sanjeev Kumar dismissed the appeal of State and uphold the judgment of the Writ Court quashing the premature retirement of Naib Tehsildar Fida Hussain and Assistant Director CAPD TP Singh.
Again on December 8, 2017 a Division Bench headed by Chief Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed and Justice Sanjeev Kumar quashed the premature retirement of one Girdawar Kuldip Kumar.
Acting abroad doesn’t count as work experience in India:Nimrat
SC refuses to modify order allowing release of ‘Padmaavat’
Salman’s Bajrangi Bhaijaan to release on 8000 screens in China
Salman’s ‘Sultan’ wins big at Tehran Intl Sports Film Festival
Aziz Ansari skips SAG Awards amid sexual misconduct claims
© 2017 State Times Daily Newspaper