Dear Editor, This document is written after thorough research investigations. People can make me more enlighten by correcting it or further communication. Article is backed by information gathered from students while serving in different Degree Colleges of JAMMU division. Going through literature I find worthwhile to put true facts & defeat all those who being poor in knowledge spreading falsehood on legal provisions of state. During beginning of 1900, Kashmirs in particular Pandits (KPs) being qualified & visionary led protests demanding state subject to stop influx from outside state for employment & purchasing property. Maharajah granted state subject somewhere in 1927. Muslims being second class citizens led protests against their overall & in particular ecomical backwardness. Some Muslim from across then J&K British India while visiting Kashmir infused menace of antiMaharaja rule as result while going through a court case against a Muslim from British India, firing took place for law & order on July 13, 1931. Sheikh Abdullah being a teacher further led movement & in 1947 played role along with Nehru-Patel stayed with India but against Maharaja. Latter accession took place the reasons you know. Article 35A introduced in 1954 declaring people of J&K the citizens of India & 370 retained for purpose of employments & property matters. Under these legal provisions the Indian Laws are part of state laws. Recently SC benefit law introduced amending 370 retaining legal instruments intact. It shows all provisions exist in state legal documents to introduce Indian Laws. Migration took place in 1990 comprising people from all communities but KPs in large number. They KP being Hindus got exploited being removed by Muslims projecting a Hindu-Muslim issue an age old menace. They are still getting benefits being Hindu migrants. Now unnecessarily Muslims are being exploited & for want of knowledge 35A & 370 are being linked with ongoing militancy that otherwise is due to political failures. Every where cry there to scrap these provisions. In 2014 all BJP leaders enticed Jammu region in particular Hindus of J&K that militancy will end after scrapping legal provisions. Militancy reasons are different. Supreme Court is also approached against 35A & 370. These can be scrapped if j&K Assembly recommends as per Indian Constitution. Poor vision politicians have unnecessary made people fool. A large number from outside have well established economically sound. It is said that they financly support political leaders & their programs who in turn have been advocating the scrapping of legal provisions. The beneficial are the politicians & if they succeed the outsiders will be benefitted to own huge immovable properties & business establishments. State subject is the gift of Kashmir Pandits. Subsequent entry of 370 & 35A are further legal provisions. These cannot be scrapped but make people the citizens of India & employment/property rights intact not to outsiders. Dr Kuldeep Singh, Via-e-mail.
Waiting for release of Modi biopic, Oberoi visits Sai temple
‘Mental Hai Kya’ makers say the film celebrates individuality, doesn’t offend
Prateik Babbar to play antagonist in Rajinikanth’s ‘Darbar’
‘Andhadhun’ crosses Rs 200 cr mark at China box office
Priyanka Chopra, Nick Jonas part of 2019 Met Gala Host Committee
© 2017 State Times Daily Newspaper